EX PARTE JOHN ANTHONY SALAZAR (other)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window

















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-76,619

EX PARTE JOHN ANTHONY SALAZAR, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F04-00188-S IN THE 282ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Salazar v. State, No. 05-05-1455-CR (Tex. App.-Dallas, November 14, 2006).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to preserve error and that the prosecution failed to disclose evidence favorable to the defense.

The trial court originally recommended granting relief, but this Court remanded the application for further findings. The trial court has now determined that the evidence withheld from the defense was material and that had the evidence been turned over, there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different. Based on those findings, the trial court again recommends that this Court grant relief.

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. F04-00188-S in the 282nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the Dallas County Sheriff to answer the charge against him. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.



Delivered: September 14, 2011

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.