KEVIN VANCE EDIC v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (Dissenting Statement)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-0623-11

KEVIN VANCE EDIC, Appellant

v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS COUNTY

Meyers, J., filed a dissenting statement.

DISSENTING STATEMENT





I would grant Appellant's petition for discretionary review and affirm the court of appeals. While I agree with the decision of the court of appeals, I do not feel that the issue raised by Appellant was fully addressed in the opinion. We have determined that a threat under the retaliation statute can be communicated to the person being threatened through a third party, however, we have never considered whether the complainant must have knowledge of the threat. Because this is an issue we should deliberate, I respectfully dissent to the Court's decision to refuse Appellant's petition for discretionary review.



Meyers, J.



Filed: August 24, 2011

Publish







Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.