EX PARTE REYES NOEL VILLALOVOS (other)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window

















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-76,590

EX PARTE REYES NOEL VILLALOVOS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 13,300-B IN THE 104TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated kidnapping and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Villalovos v. State, No. 11-00-00193-CR (Tex. App.-Eastland March 29, 2001, no pet.).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to advise Applicant of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Eleventh Court of Appeals in cause number 11-00-00193-CR that affirmed his conviction in case number 13,300-B from the 104th Judicial District Court of Taylor County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Eleventh Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues. Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).



Delivered: June 29, 2011

Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.