EX PARTE CHARLIE JAMES COLLINS, JR. (other)

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

 

NO. WR-74,846-01


EX PARTE CHARLIE JAMES COLLINS, JR., Applicant

 

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 15626B IN THE 104TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

 

O R D E R

 

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and sentenced to forty years imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Collins v. State, No. 11-08-00156-CR (Tex. App. Eastland, delivered May 21, 2009).

Applicant contends that he was denied the right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review because after he timely placed his petition in the prison mail system, it was delivered to the wrong address.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Campbell v. State, No. PD-1081-09 (Tex. Crim. App., delivered September 22, 2010). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Pursuant to Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order the mailroom logs from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division Unit where Applicant was housed at the time he claims he placed his pro se petition for discretionary review into the prison mail system to determine the merits of Applicant s claim. The trial court may also use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant timely placed his pro se petition for discretionary review into the prison mail system and whether his petition was addressed to the Eleventh Court of Appeals, as required. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

 

Filed: November 17, 2010

Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.