EX PARTE LACEDRIC DWAINE RAY (other)

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

 

NO. AP-76,369, AP-76,370, AP-76,371, AP-76,372 & AP-76,373


EX PARTE LACEDRIC DWAINE RAY, Applicant

 

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 11343-A, 11346-A, 11344-A, 11345-A & 11630-A

IN THE 77TH DISTRICT COURT FROM LIMESTONE COUNTY

Per curiam.

 

O P I N I O N

 

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of three counts of aggravated assault, one count of unlawful possession of a firearm, and one count of unlawful carrying weapons. He was sentenced to thirty-five years imprisonment on each count. The Tenth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeals. Ray v. State, Nos. 10-09-00148-CR, 10-09-00149-CR, 10-09-00150-CR, 10-09-00151-CR & 10-09-00152-CR (Tex. App. Waco 2009, no pet.).

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because she failed to timely file notices of appeal. We remanded these applications to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court has determined that trial counsel failed to timely file notices of appeal. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time appeals of the judgments of conviction in Cause Nos. 11343-A, 11346-A, 11344-A, 11345-A, and 11630-A from the 77th Judicial District Court of Limestone County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give written notices of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain meaningful appeals. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentences had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute appeals, he must take affirmative steps to file written notices of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: June 30, 2010

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.