EX PARTE MARCUS L. JOHNS (other)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window

span.WPParaBox { padding: 0px; width: 100%; margin: 0px; display: block } div.WPParaBoxWrapper { padding: 0px; float: left } p { margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1px } hr { height: 0.0125in; background-color: black } body { font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal }








IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-76,032




EX PARTE MARCUS L. JOHNS, Applicant




ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 853289-A IN THE 183RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY




           Per curiam.


O P I N I O N


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to 60 years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Johns v. State, AP-14-02-00206-CR, (Tex. App.– Houston [14th dist.], 2003, no pet.) (not designated for publication).

            Applicant contends inter alia that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify him that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se.

            The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that Applicant was deprived of his right to file a petition for discretionary review pro se. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. AP-14-02-00206-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 853289-A from the 183rd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

            Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

 

Delivered: November 5, 2008

Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.