WILLIAM CLARK v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (other)
Annotate this Casespan.WPParaBox { padding: 0px; width: 100%; margin: 0px; display: block } div.WPParaBoxWrapper { padding: 0px; float: left } p { margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1px } hr { height: 0.0125in; background-color: black } body { font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal }
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. PD-122-08
WILLIAM CLARK, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS
GRAYSON COUNTY
Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.
ORDER
The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5, because the grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.
En banc
Filed: April 2, 2008
Do Not Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.