WILLIAM CLARK v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (other)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window

span.WPParaBox { padding: 0px; width: 100%; margin: 0px; display: block } div.WPParaBoxWrapper { padding: 0px; float: left } p { margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1px } hr { height: 0.0125in; background-color: black } body { font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal }





IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-122-08



WILLIAM CLARK, Appellant


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

GRAYSON COUNTY



           Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.



ORDER

           The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5, because the grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.

           The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

           The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.

En banc

Filed: April 2, 2008

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.