EX PARTE JESUS RAMIREZ (original)
Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. AP-75,816
EX PARTE JESUS RAMIREZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 3084-A IN THE 154TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM LAMB COUNTY
Per curiam.
O P I N I O N
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Ramirez v. State, No. 07-98-00277-CR (Tex. App. - Amarillo, April 30, 2001, pet. ref'd)).
Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to investigate known alibi witnesses and known alternative suspects.
The trial court has determined that trial counsel's failure to investigate known alibi witnesses and known alternative suspects constituted deficient performance that prejudiced applicant. The court finds that had an adequate investigation been conducted, there is a reasonable probability that the evidence that would have been discovered and presented at trial would have created a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors and resulted in a different verdict. The court further finds that as a result of the failure to discover and present this evidence, one's confidence in the outcome of this case is undermined. These findings are supported by the record. See Ex parte Thompson, 153 S.W.3d 416, 418 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with the trial court that Applicant is entitled to a new trial.
Habeas corpus relief is granted. The judgment in cause number 3084 from the 154th District Court of Lamb County is vacated, and Applicant is ordered remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Lamb County so that he may answer the charges against him.
Delivered: January 16, 2008
Do Not Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
