Roe v. Bibby
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Jane Roe, as parent and natural guardian of Judy Roe, James Roe, and Joyce Roe, Minor Children Under the Age of Eighteen, (18), Petitioners, v. Daniel Bibby Sr. and Michelle Bibby, Defendants, of Whom Michelle Bibby is the Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2014-002500 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Berkeley County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 27652 Heard November 5, 2015 – Filed August 10, 2016 DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED Eric M. Poulin, of Anastopoulo Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, for Petitioners. Eugene P. Corrigan, III and J.W. Nelson Chandler, both of Corrigan & Chandler, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Roe v. Bibby, 410 S.C. 287, 763 S.E.2d 645 (Ct. App. 2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN and FEW, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
