South Carolina Supreme Court Decisions 2007
Williamsburg Rural Water v. Williamsburg County Water
Date: December 17, 2007
Docket Number: 2007-MO-071
Date: December 17, 2007
Docket Number: 2007-MO-071
In the Matter of McBee, Bethune, and Lynchburg Municipal Court Judge Fred D. Stephens
Date: September 10, 2007
Docket Number: 26378
Date: September 10, 2007
Docket Number: 26378
In the Matter of Retired Lee County Magistrate Davis A. White
Date: August 13, 2007
Docket Number: 26370
Date: August 13, 2007
Docket Number: 26370
New York Times Co. v. Spartanburg County School District No. 7
Date: July 16, 2007
Docket Number: 26358
Date: July 16, 2007
Docket Number: 26358
Davenport Properties v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
Date: June 25, 2007
Docket Number: 2007-MO-039
Date: June 25, 2007
Docket Number: 2007-MO-039
Chester v. South Carolina Department of Public Safety
Date: June 25, 2007
Docket Number: 2007-MO-042
Date: June 25, 2007
Docket Number: 2007-MO-042
In the Matter of Darlington County Magistrate James E. Thomas
Date: March 12, 2007
Docket Number: 26290
Date: March 12, 2007
Docket Number: 26290
Johnson v. SC Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services
Date: February 27, 2007
Docket Number: 26277
Date: February 27, 2007
Docket Number: 26277
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Larry Gene Beaver
Date: February 27, 2007
Docket Number: 26279
Date: February 27, 2007
Docket Number: 26279
Responsible Economic Development v. S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control
Date: January 22, 2007
Docket Number: 26248
Date: January 22, 2007
Docket Number: 26248
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites.
These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site,
or the information linked to on the state site.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.