UP-368 - Porter v. Porter

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Alfreda G. Porter, Respondent, v. Ernest J. Porter, Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-000484 Appeal From Sumter County Dorothy Mobley Jones, Family Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-368 Submitted August 1, 2014 – Filed November 5, 2014 AFFIRMED Charles Thomas Brooks, III, of Law Office of Charles T. Brooks, III, of Sumter, for Appellant. Kenneth R. Young, Jr., of Sumter, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Sanderson v. Sanderson, 391 S.C. 249, 255, 705 S.E.2d 65, 67-68 (Ct. App. 2010) (stating to be preserved for appellate review, an issue must have been (1) raised to and ruled upon by the trial court; (2) raised by the appellant; (3) raised in a timely manner; and (4) raised to the trial court with sufficient specificity (citing S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. First Carolina Corp. of S.C., 372 S.C. 295, 301-02, 641 S.E.2d 903, 907 (2007))); Hickman v. Hickman, 301 S.C. 455, 456, 392 S.E.2d 481, 482 (Ct. App. 1990) ("A party cannot use Rule 59(e) to present to the [family] court an issue the party could have raised prior to judgment but did not."). AFFIRMED.1 FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.