UP-475 - State v. Dingle
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Samuel Dingle, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2011-193567 Appeal from Orangeburg County Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-475 Submitted October 1, 2014 – Filed December 23, 2014 AFFIRMED Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, and Appellant Defenders Breen Richard Stevens and Benjamin John Tripp, all of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Donahue, 400 S.C. 604, 607 n.1, 735 S.E.2d 547, 549 n.1 (Ct. App. 2012) (noting an argument that is not presented to the trial judge is not preserved for appellate review); State v. Stroman, 281 S.C. 508, 513, 316 S.E.2d 395, 399 (1984) ("[A] party cannot complain of an error which his own conduct has induced." (internal quotation marks omitted)). AFFIRMED.1 FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
