Reaves v. Reaves
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Willie D. Reaves, Respondent,
Franklin Reaves, Appellant.
Appeal From Marion County
William Young, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-172
Submitted April 1, 2009 Filed April 27, 2009
Franklin C. Reaves, pro se Appellant.
Willie D. Reaves, pro se Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Franklin Reeves appeals from the family court's order finding him in contempt for his willful violation of the court's prior order to pay alimony to Willie Reaves. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: S.C Code Ann. § 63-3-620 (Supp. 2008) ("An adult who willfully violates, neglects, or refuses to obey or perform a lawful order of the court . . . may be proceeded against for contempt of court."); Frye v. Frye, 323 S.C. 72, 75-76, 448 S.E.2d 586, 588 (Ct. App. 1994) (citing Jordan v. Harrison, 303 S.C. 522, 402 S.E.2d 188 (Ct. App. 1991)) ("[W]here one held in contempt for violation of a court order complies with the order, his compliance renders the issue of contempt moot and precludes appellate review of the contempt proceeding.").
Huff, Williams, and Konduros, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.