Office of Disciplinary Counsel pet. v. Neil Warner Price (Dissenting Opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[J-87-1999] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : NEIL WERNER PRICE, : : Respondent : : : : : No. 486 Disciplinary Docket 3 No. 101 DB 1995 Disciplinary Board Attorney Registration No. 35114 (Cambria) ARGUED: April 27, 1999 DISSENTING OPINION MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FLAHERTY DECIDED: JUNE 24, 1999 The appropriate discipline, in my view, is disbarment. Messrs. Justice Castille and Nigro join this dissenting opinion.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.