Oregon Tax Court, Regular Division Decisions 2005

Webb v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: December 6, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4731
Freitag v. Department of Revenue and Lincoln County Assessor
Date: November 7, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4718
Poddar v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: September 22, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4689
Bhagwati P. Poddar v. Department of Revenue and Clatsop County Assessor
Date: September 1, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4689
Sproul & Sproul Inc. v. Deschutes County Assessor
Date: August 17, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4734
Hoyt Street Properties LLC v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: July 14, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4713
Wynne v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: July 7, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4709
Smith v. Washington County Assessor
Date: July 6, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4710
Gall v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: June 16, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4725
Croslin v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: June 16, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4727
ZRZ Properties, LLC v. City of Portland
Date: May 10, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4701
Christenson v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: April 22, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4703
Yanez v. Washington County Assessor
Date: April 22, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4711
Patton II v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: April 21, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4621
Dept. of Rev. v. Wheeler II
Date: April 21, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4633
Masse II v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: April 21, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4673
Knapp II v. City of Jacksonville
Date: April 14, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4641
Washington Co. Assessor I v. Jehovah's Witnesses
Date: March 22, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4708
Negrete v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: March 22, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4760
Tarabochia v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: March 17, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4648
PUD v. Dept. of Revenue
Date: January 26, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4560
Trendwest Resorts, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: January 20, 2005
Docket Number: TC 4645
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.