Wong v. Dept. of Rev.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax JEFFREY M. WONG, ATTORNEY Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 170131G FINAL DECISION1 This matter came before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (motion), filed on April 28, 2017. Plaintiff filed his Complaint on April 7, 2017, requesting that Defendant abate its assessment of Lane County Mass Transit District payroll tax because neither Plaintiff nor his employees worked in that transit district the period ending September 30, 2016. In its motion, Defendant stated that it “has abated the assessments from which Plaintiff appealed.” Considering that Defendant agreed to provide Plaintiff with the relief requested, this case is ready for decision. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Defendant shall cancel its Notice of Assessment, dated February 6, 2017. Defendant shall issue or otherwise credit to Plaintiff any applicable refund, plus statutory interest. /// /// /// /// 1 This Final Decision incorporates the court’s Decision, entered May 1, 2017. In his Complaint, filed April 7, 2017, Plaintiff requested his costs and disbursements. The court did not receive an objection from Defendant within 14 days after its Decision was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(2)(a). FINAL DECISION TC-MD 170131G 1 IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that Plaintiff’s request for an award of his costs and disbursements is granted in the amount of $252. Dated this day of May, 2017. POUL F. LUNDGREN MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision, file a complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision or this Final Decision cannot be changed. TCR-MD 19 B. This document was filed and entered on May 22, 2017. FINAL DECISION TC-MD 170131G 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.