Pankey v. Ross Correctional Inst.

Download as PDF
Loading PDF...
[Cite as Pankey v. Ross Correctional Inst., 2002-Ohio-6870.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO BENJAMIN R. PANKEY : Plaintiff : CASE NO. 99-13959 v. : JUDGMENT ENTRY ROSS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Defendant : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : {¶1} This case was tried to a magistrate of the court. On October 7, 2002, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant. {¶2} Civ.R. 53 states: “Within 14 days of the filing of a magistrate’s decision, a party may file written objections to the magistrate’s decision.” Plaintiff has not filed an objection. {¶3} Upon review of the record and the magistrate’s decision, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. assessed against plaintiff. Court costs are The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. ________________________________ JUDGE Entry cc: Benjamin R. Pankey Pro se Case No. 99-13959 -2- MAGISTRATE DECISION 1096 Eastway Drive #2 Youngstown, Ohio 44506 John P. Reichley 65 East State St., 16th Fl. Columbus, Ohio 43215 LP/cmd Filed 11-25-2002 Jr. Vol. 726, Pgs. 81-82 To S.C. reporter 12-13-2002 Assistant Attorney General