Thorson v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2014 ND 213

David L. Thorson, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20140144

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Robert Wade Martin, North Dakota Public Defenders' Office, 11 1st Avenue SW, Minot, ND 58701, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Brian David Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue NW, Mandan, ND 58554, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Thorson v. StateNo. 20140144

Per Curiam.

[¶1] David L. Thorson appeals from a district court order denying his application for postconviction relief. Thorson argues the district court erred in finding representation of his attorneys at trial and at his first postconviction relief proceeding, respectively, did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to call a witness at trial and, subsequently, counsel failed to argue the failure to do so at the first postconviction relief proceeding. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court's findings of facts are not clearly erroneous.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.