State v. Szklarski

Annotate this Case

Filed Nov. 9, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 205

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Daniel Raymond Szklarski, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20100087

Appeal from the District Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard M Geiger, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Barbara L. Whelan, State's Attorney, Walsh County Courthouse, 600 Cooper Ave., 3rd Floor, Grafton, N.D. 58237, for plaintiff and appellee.
Darla J. Schuman, Schuman Law Office, 3001-A 32nd Ave. S., Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Szklarski
No. 20100087

Per Curiam.

[1] Daniel Szklarski appeals from the trial court's judgment and order revoking his probation. On appeal, Szklarski argues the trial court erred in allowing him to represent himself at the probation revocation hearing because he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.