State v. Jackson

[Go to Documents]Filed May 11, 2010 [Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2010 ND 72

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Grady Lee Jackson, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20090341

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Robert O. Wefald, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, N.D. 58501; for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Grady Lee Jackson, self-represented, 344 Continental Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58504; defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Jackson
No. 20090341

Per Curiam.

[1] Grady Jackson appeals from a criminal judgment after the trial court found him guilty of his fourth driving under suspension violation in five years. On appeal, Jackson raises numerous arguments, including that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion to suppress evidence; the State failed to show harm or prejudice if the trial had been delayed for an exclusive suppression hearing; the stop was discriminatory; and the trial court did not adjudicate in a fair and independent manner. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).

[2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner