Edward Koehl v. S. Mirza
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------No. 216 SSM 50 Edward Koehl, Appellant, v. S. Mirza et al., Respondents. Submitted by appellant, pro se. Submitted by Robert M. Goldfarb, for respondents. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order modified, without costs, by reinstating plaintiff's claims under 42 USC ยง 1983 and remitting the case to Supreme Court, Clinton County, for further proceedings on those claims, and, as so modified, affirmed (see Haywood v Drown, 556 US , 129 S Ct 2108 [2009], on remand 13 NY3d 760 [2009]). Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur. Decided December 17, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
