Arts4All, Ltd. v. Judith L. Hancock/Judith L. Hancock v. Daniel Y.C. Ng
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------No. 206 SSM 32 Arts4All, Ltd., et al., Respondents, v. Judith L. Hancock, Appellant, --------------------------------Judith L. Hancock, Counterclaim PlaintiffAppellant, v. Daniel Y.C. Ng, et al., Additional Defendants on Counterclaims, Peter Osgood, Respondent. Submitted by David G. Trachtenberg, for appellant. Submitted by Zachary R. Greenhill, for respondents. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. The courts below did not abuse their discretion in dismissing defendant's counterclaims pursuant to CPLR 3126(3) (see Arts4All, Ltd. v Hancock, 12 NY3d 846 [2009]). Defendant's remaining argument is without merit. Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur. Chief Judge Lippman took no part. Decided October 20, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
