Edward Koehl v. S. Mirza

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 187 Edward Koehl, Appellant, v. S. Mirza et al., Respondents. Appellant, pro se. Robert M. Goldfarb, for respondents. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Upon reargument, following remand by the Supreme Court of the United States, this Court's November 27, 2007 dismissal order vacated and appeal reinstated (see Koehl v Mirza, ___ US ___, 129 S Ct 2734 [2009]; Haywood v Drown, 556 US ___, 129 S Ct 2108 [2009]). Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur. Decided September 8, 2009

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.