Matter of Jose Felton v Donald Selsky

Annotate this Case
Matter of Felton v Selsky 2003 NY Slip Op 19381 [2 AD3d 1033] December 11, 2003 Appellate Division, Third Department As corrected through Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 25, 2004

In the Matter of Jose Felton, Petitioner,
v
Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt is found in the misbehavior report, the positive laboratory test results with their supporting documentation, and the hearing testimony of the correction officer who prepared the misbehavior report after collecting petitioner's urine specimen and performing the laboratory tests thereon (see Matter of Valerio v Selsky, 306 AD2d 713 [2003]; Matter of Tingue v McCoy, 299 AD2d 779 [2002]). Petitioner's contention that he was improperly denied the right to call a witness has been examined and found to be meritless.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.