People v Kamal

Annotate this Case
People v Kamal 2016 NY Slip Op 07978 Decided on November 23, 2016 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 23, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
2015-07324
(Ind. No. 1639/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Ahmed Kamal, appellant.



Laurette Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered January 22, 2015, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the mandatory surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing should be waived is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Ruz, 70 NY2d 942, 943; People v Francis, 82 AD3d 1263; People v Ziolkowski, 9 AD3d 915) and, in any event, without merit (see CPL 420.35[2]; People v Jones, 26 NY3d 730; People v Bones, 52 AD3d 522, 523; People v Domin, 13 AD3d 391, 392; People v Owens, 10 AD3d 619).

CHAMBERS, J.P., DICKERSON, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.