People v Sears

Annotate this Case
People v Sears 2016 NY Slip Op 07981 Decided on November 23, 2016 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 23, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
2013-11068
(Ind. No. 45/13)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Allah Sears, appellant.



Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Alexander Fumelli of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered November 21, 2013, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, including the defendant's background, which includes a prior felony conviction from which an appeal was taken (see People v Sears, 9 AD3d 472), we conclude that the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was valid (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 340-342; cf. People v Zaffuto, 138 AD3d 1156; see generally People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 138). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833; People v Cannon, 123 AD3d 1138; People v Vaiana, 119 AD3d 879).

DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.