Matter of Crowe v McKay

Annotate this Case
Matter of Crowe v McKay 2006 NY Slip Op 09616 [35 AD3d 735] December 19, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

In the Matter of Rachel L. Crowe, Respondent,
v
Lauren J. McKay, Respondent, and William T. Lai, Appellant.

—[*1]In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), dated March 10, 2006, which, after a hearing, granted the maternal aunt's petition to change custody of the subject child from the parents to her.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the subject child is now over the age of 18, she is no longer subject to the order changing custody (see Matter of Lozada v Pinto, 7 AD3d 801 [2004]). Accordingly, the appeal has been rendered academic. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.