People v Collier

People v Collier 2006 NY Slip Op 09484 [35 AD3d 628] December 12, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Maurice Collier, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered August 2, 2004, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the second degree (two counts), and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of his right to counsel at an investigatory lineup (see People v Wilson, 89 NY2d 754 [1997]; People v LaClere, 76 NY2d 670 [1990]; People v Coates, 74 NY2d 244 [1989]). The factual findings and credibility determinations of a hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Ortiz, 31 AD3d 580 [2006]). Here, the court's determinations were supported by the record. Thus, the court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the identification testimony. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.