People v Cohen

Annotate this Case
People v Cohen 2006 NY Slip Op 08755 [34 AD3d 660] November 21, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Steven Cohen, Appellant.

—[*1]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), dated October 7, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level two sex offender and imposed a $50 sex offender registration fee upon the defendant.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof imposing a $50 sex offender registration fee upon the defendant pursuant to Penal Law § 60.35 (1) (a) (iv); as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the Supreme Court's determination to designate the defendant a level two sex offender, and thus it will not be disturbed on appeal (see People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404 [2005]; People v Brown, 7 AD3d 595 [2004]; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]).

However, the court improperly imposed the $50 sex offender registration fee upon the defendant since it is undisputed that the underlying offense was committed prior to the 2003 amendment to Penal Law § 60.35 which provided for the imposition of a sex offender registration fee (see Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [a] [iv]; People v Lloyd, 23 AD3d 296 [2005]; People v Allen, 17 AD3d 151 [2005]; see also People v Valdelamar, 122 AD2d 289 [1986]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.