People v Thomas

Annotate this Case
People v Thomas 2006 NY Slip Op 08276 [34 AD3d 606] November 14, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Joe Thomas, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), rendered April 9, 2003, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of a fair trial as a result of alleged prosecutorial misconduct (see People v Andrews, 30 AD3d 434 [2006]; People v Trinidad, 22 AD3d 612 [2005]).

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Sanchez, 267 AD2d 960 [1999]; People v Winbush, 199 AD2d 447 [1993]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.