People v Julio Delossantos

Annotate this Case
People v Delossantos 2006 NY Slip Op 05655 [31 AD3d 575] July 11, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 20, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Julio Delossantos, Appellant.

—[*1]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), imposed January 30, 2003, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of seven years to life imprisonment.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant, who was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, a class A-II felony, seeks resentencing under the provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738; hereinafter the DLRA). With exceptions not pertinent here, the DLRA itself does not permit retroactive application of its provisions to persons who committed crimes prior to its effective date of January 13, 2005 (see People v Dickerson, 28 AD3d 787 [2006]; People v Mann, 28 AD3d 791 [2006]). The defendant took and perfected this appeal prior to the October 29, 2005, effective date of a post-DLRA statute—L 2005, ch 643. The latter statute, in effect, permits the retroactive application of the new sentencing structure of the DLRA to defendants convicted of class A-II felonies (see People v Dickerson, supra; People v Mann, supra). However, the defendant must follow the procedure of L 2005, ch 643, which requires, inter alia, that he apply, on notice to the District Attorney, for resentencing in the court which imposed the original sentence. That court must then make a determination of that application, according to the procedures detailed in L 2005, ch 643, subject to appellate review according to the terms of the new statute. Miller, J.P., Adams, Goldstein and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.