Tesla Capital, LLC v W. Randall Jones

Annotate this Case
Tesla Capital, LLC v Jones 2006 NY Slip Op 05357 [31 AD3d 434] July 5, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Tesla Capital, LLC, Appellant,
v
W. Randall Jones, Respondent. Ravi Kumra, Proposed Appellant.

—[*1]In an action to recover on a promissory note brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the plaintiff and the additional counterclaim defendant appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered July 29, 2005, which denied their motion to dismiss the defendant's counterclaims and setoffs.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the counterclaims and setoffs are dismissed.

The defendant's "Amended Counterclaims and Set-Offs as of Right" asserted September 1, 2004, were not properly maintainable in this action, which had been concluded by judgment entered June 3, 2004. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.