People v William Stewart

Annotate this Case
People v Stewart 2006 NY Slip Op 05045 [30 AD3d 624] Decided on June 20, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 20, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
REINALDO E. RIVERA
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
2005-08628 DECISION & ORDER

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

William Stewart, appellant. (Ind. No. 05-00516)




Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R.
Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 31, 2005, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Saunders, 19 AD3d 744; People v Ciatto, 290 AD2d 560; People v Walsh, 243 AD2d 590). Although the waiver did not preclude review of the defendant's claim that his plea was not voluntarily or knowingly made, this claim is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground (see People v Hussain, 309 AD2d 818; People v Harrell, 288 AD2d 489; People v Sierra, 256 AD2d 598).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
FLORIO, J.P., SANTUCCI, RIVERA and FISHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.