Matter of Antonio Vega v Rosaicela Mora Diaz

Annotate this Case
Matter of Vega v Diaz 2006 NY Slip Op 05025 [30 AD3d 608] Decided on June 20, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 20, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
STEPHEN G. CRANE, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
2004-10399 DECISION & ORDER

[*1]In the Matter of Antonio Vega, respondent,

v

Rosaicela Mora Diaz, appellant. (Proceeding No. 1)



In the Matter of Rosaicela Mora Diaz, appellant,

v

Antonio Vega, respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. V-433-03, V-434-03)




Ryan & Schwarz, LLP, Suffern, N.Y. (John M. Schwarz, Jr., of
counsel), for appellant.
Jacqueline Sands, New City, N.Y., Law Guardian for the
children.

In related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), entered October 28, 2004, which, after a hearing, awarded custody of the parties' children to the father.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; Fediuk v Fediuk, 173 AD2d 769).

CRANE, J.P., RITTER, KRAUSMAN and SKELOS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.