Matter of Ronald M. Ackridge v Samuel Walker
Annotate this CaseIn the Matter of Ronald M. Ackridge, Petitioner,
v
Samuel Walker, Respondent.
—[*1]Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, Samuel Walker, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to determine the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, inter alia, to vacate a judgment rendered October 8, 2003, in People v Ackridge, under Westchester County indictment No. 03-0573.
Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,
Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
By order dated January 13, 2006, the Supreme Court, Westchester County, denied the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10. The present proceeding is therefore academic. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.