People v Ernesto Marmol

People v Marmol 2006 NY Slip Op 02217 [27 AD3d 1204] Decided on March 21, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 21, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO
MARK C. DILLON, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2005-02792

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Ernesto Marmol, appellant. (Ind. No. 337/04)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John
M. Castellano and William Milaccio
of counsel; Lindsey Frischer on the
memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), imposed March 16, 2005, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ADAMS, KRAUSMAN, SPOLZINO and DILLON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court