People v Augustin Sanchez

Annotate this Case
People v Sanchez 2006 NY Slip Op 01658 [27 AD3d 1204] Decided on March 7, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 7, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
STEPHEN G. CRANE
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2004-03709

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Augustin Sanchez, appellant. (Ind. No. 2113/03)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y.
(John M. Castellano, Donna Aldea,
and John F. McGoldrick of counsel),
for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), imposed April 14, 2004, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, CRANE, LUCIANO and FISHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.