People v Erin Thurmond

Annotate this Case
People v Thurmond 2006 NY Slip Op 00539 [25 AD3d 726] January 24, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 22, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Erin Thurmond, Appellant.

—[*1]

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), both rendered July 1, 2004, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, robbery in the third degree, and attempted robbery in the third degree under indictment No. 1692N/03, and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree under indictment No. 1937N/03, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered into the plea agreements, and concomitantly waived his right to appeal both his convictions and sentences. Since the defendant's claim that he should be afforded a second opportunity to challenge certain comments made about him in the pre-sentence report is not one that calls into question the legality of the sentences imposed, the claim is foreclosed from appellate review (see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 [1992]; People v Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89 [2000]; People v Egan, 6 AD3d 1206 [2004]; see also People v Hansen, 95 NY2d 227 [2000]; People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686 [1986]). Cozier, J.P., Santucci, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.