People v Jason Bullock

Annotate this Case
People v Bullock 2006 NY Slip Op 00530 [25 AD3d 1069] Decided on January 24, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 24, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
PETER B. SKELOS
JOSEPH COVELLO, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2004-05789
2004-05790

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Jason Bullock, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 1780/03, 2659/03)




Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of
counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Marcia
R. Kucera of counsel), for
respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two amended sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), both imposed June 9, 2004, on the ground that the amended sentences are excessive.

ORDERED that the amended sentences are affirmed. No opinion.
COZIER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, SKELOS and COVELLO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.