John Kingston v Michael Breslin

Annotate this Case
Kingston v Breslin 2006 NY Slip Op 00481 [25 AD3d 657] January 24, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 22, 2006

John Kingston, Respondent,
v
Michael Breslin et al., Appellants.

—[*1]In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is a shareholder of the defendant Atlantic-Heydt Corporation and its affiliates, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered May 27, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Kingston v Breslin, 25 AD3d 657 [2006]). Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.