Alan Rosenfeld v Community School District #28

Annotate this Case
Rosenfeld v Community School Dist. #28 2006 NY Slip Op 00344 [25 AD3d 596] January 17, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Alan Rosenfeld, Appellant,
v
Community School District #28 et al., Respondents.

—[*1]In an application, in effect, to vacate an arbitration award, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated June 4, 2004, which denied his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his application.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff's motion was, in effect, one for leave to reargue. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument (see Pacella v Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, 14 AD3d 545 [2005]; Amsler v Verrilli, 203 AD2d 403 [1994]). Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.