Wantuck v City of Buffalo

Annotate this Case
Wantuck v City of Buffalo 2016 NY Slip Op 07799 Decided on November 18, 2016 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 18, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND CURRAN, JJ.
1036 CA 16-01066

[*1]RENEE WANTUCK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF TYLER BOCHENSKI, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

CITY OF BUFFALO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



LAW OFFICES OF JAMES MORRIS, BUFFALO (JACLYN F. SILVER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY A. BALL, CORPORATION COUNSEL, BUFFALO (DAVID M. LEE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Shirley Troutman, J.), entered September 3, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff, individually and as parent and natural guardian of her son, commenced this negligence action seeking damages for injuries sustained by her son when he struck a trash receptacle located on a sidewalk after he lost control and fell off of a bicycle that he had been riding on the street. We conclude that Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendant met its initial burden of establishing as a matter of law that the trash receptacle constituted an "open and obvious" condition, and that it was not "inherently dangerous" (Jordan-Parker v City of Buffalo, 137 AD3d 1751, 1752; see Jones v City of New York, 32 AD3d 706, 706-707), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).

Entered: November 18, 2016

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.