Matter of Rosa M. v Francisco P.
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 6, 2017
Renwick, J.P., Richter, Feinman, Gische, Kahn, JJ.
4171
[*1]In re Rosa M., Petitioner-Appellant,
v
Francisco P., Respondent-Respondent.
Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.
Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, attorney for the child.
Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Gail A. Adams, Referee), entered on or about February 8, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, modified a visitation order to provide for overnight visitation with the parties' child every Wednesday until April 14, 2016, unanimously dismissed, without costs.
The temporary visitation order is not an order of disposition and thus not appealable as of right (see Family Ct Act § 1112[a]; Matter of Holtzman v Holtzman, 47 AD2d 620 [1st Dept 1975]), and we decline to review it (see id.). Moreover,
the appeal is moot, as the temporary order has already expired (see Matter of Sasha B. [Erica B.], 73 AD3d 587, 587 [1st Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 16 NY3d 755 [2011]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JUNE 6, 2017
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.