Matter of Clark v Ortega
Annotate this CaseDecided on August 23, 2017 The Following Order Was Entered And Filed On August 23,
Gische, J.P., Richter, Kapnick, Webber, Kahn, JJ.
2017 4466 101103/17
[*1]In re Daniel N. Clark, Petitioner-Respondent,
v
Corey Ortega, Gricel Orit-Thompson, Saundra E. Saunders, Respondents-Appellants, The Board of Elections in the City of New York, Respondent.
Martin E. Connor, Brooklyn, for appellants.
Arthur W. Greig, New York, for respondent.
Judgement, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered on or about August 11, 2017 unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petition as supplemented by the schedule, filed and served on respondent on the return date of the order to show cause, gave detailed and timely notice of the specific signatures that petitioner was claiming had been erroneously invalidated by the Board of Elections (Election Law § 16-102).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: AUGUST 23, 2017
DEPUTY CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.