Matter of Ifill v Carruthers
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 1, 2015
Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
16263 143/14 -4543
[*1] In re Dr. Richard Sunday Ifill, Petitioner,
v
Hon. Richard D. Carruthers, etc., et al., Respondents.
Dr. Richard Sunday Ifill, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Richard D. Carruthers, respondent.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rachel Ehrhardt of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 1, 2015
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.