People v Majid

Annotate this Case
People v Majid 2012 NY Slip Op 06267 Decided on September 25, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 25, 2012
Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman, Richter, JJ.
8095 3167/01

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Mohd Majid, Defendant-Appellant.




Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Nancy E.
Little of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (David C.
Bornstein of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered on or about November 12, 2009, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the court's discretionary upward departure to level three. The court properly determined that although defendant received points relating to his use of violence in the commission of the underlying sex crime, the risk assessment instrument did not adequately take into account the extreme brutality of the crime, which led to convictions of attempted murder in the second degree, sodomy in the first degree, and robbery in the first degree (see e.g. People v Guasp, 95 AD3d 608 [1st Dept 2012]). These aggravating factors outweighed the mitigating factors cited by defendant.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2012

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.