Maurer v Maurer

Annotate this Case
Maurer v Maurer 2012 NY Slip Op 04283 Decided on June 5, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 5, 2012
Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Richter, JJ.
7523N 306249/10

[*1]John J. Maurer, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Suzanne Maurer, Defendant-Respondent. John A. Schiller, Nonparty Respondent.




Bonnie P. Josephs, New York, for appellant.
Winter & Grossman, PLLC, Garden City (Robert S. Grossman
of counsel), for Suzanne M., respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Deborah A. Kaplan, J.), entered May 31, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff's motion for consolidation or joint trial of two actions with this divorce action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We affirm, for the reasons stated by the IAS court. The motion court properly exercised its discretion in denying consolidation of the actions since one action was ready for trial and the others were not (see Dias v Berman, 188 AD2d 331 [1992]). We also note that because the constructive trust action concerns use and enjoyment of real property in Suffolk County, venue for that action must lie in Suffolk County (see CPLR 507; GAM Prop. Corp. v Sorrento Lactalis, Inc., 41 AD3d 645, 646 [2007]; see also Handler v 1050 Tenants Corp., 295 AD2d 238, 240 [2002]).
Accordingly, the IAS court properly denied the motion for consolidation or joint trial in New York County.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 5, 2012

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.