Perez v Nevarez
Annotate this CaseDecided on February 14, 2012
Tom, J.P., Andrias, Catterson, Richter, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
6821N 5140/08
[*1]Rhonda Perez, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v
John Nevarez, Defendant-Appellant.
John Nevarez, appellant pro se.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (La Tia W. Martin, J.), entered March 11, 2010, which denied defendant's motion to compel discovery, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.
The appeal is moot because following the issuance of the order on appeal, the motion court issued an amended order granting defendant the relief he sought, namely directing plaintiff to comply with the demand for compulsory disclosure and notice for discovery and inspection, within 45 days of the amended order.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: FEBRUARY 14, 2012
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.