Matter of Hamel v Schneiderman

Matter of Matter of Hamel v Schneiderman 2012 NY Slip Op 00657 Decided on January 31, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 31, 2012
Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
6668 4794/09 -4089

[*1]In re William Hamel, et al., Petitioners,

v

Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman, etc., et al., Respondents.




Newman & Greenberg, New York (Richard A. Greenberg of
counsel), for William Hamel, petitioner.
Morton Katz, New York, for Prabhudial Balkaran, petitioner.
David S. Greenfield, New York, for Felix De Los Santos,
petitioner.
Joshua Dratel, New York, for Gladys Diaz, petitioner.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Jodi A.
Danzig and Roberta L. Martin of counsel), for Attorney General,
respondent.

Application for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. All concur. No opinion. Order filed.