Cangro v Marangos

Annotate this Case
Cangro v Marangos 2011 NY Slip Op 08835 Decided on December 8, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 8, 2011
Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
6277 111339/09

[*1]Jennifer Cangro, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

John Z. Marangos, Defendant-Respondent.




Jennifer Cangro, appellant pro se.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered July 13, 2010, which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and granted defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Apart from the fact that the complaint amounts to an impermissible collateral attack on plaintiff's divorce judgment, it fails to state a cause of action (see CPLR 321l[a][7]). The fraud allegations are insufficiently detailed (see CPLR 3016[b]),
and the remaining allegations consist of bare legal conclusions (see Caniglia v Chicago Tribune-N.Y. News Syndicate, 204 AD2d 233 [1994]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 8, 2011

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.